True - the optional extra ( at a price !) compiler is better than the K&R, but I still
had problems done the track with building mod_perl into Apache after having built perl
cleanly with this.
Cheers.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:22:29AM -0700, Clint Olsen wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I want to distinguish /opt/ansic/bin/cc from the regular bundled POS
> compiler in /bin. If it were a choice between /bin/cc or gcc, gcc wins
> hands down, but the optional compiler is actually quite good. It's just
> not as footloose and fancy free as gcc. It follows the ANSI standard quite
> closely, whereas folks using gcc typically don't run gcc with the -ansi
> switch.
>
> -Clint
>
> On Apr 30, Piers Harding wrote:
> >
> > I have done this but I used the GCC on HP-UX - available from
> > http://devresource.hp.com. I have had so much trouble with building
> > other products such as Apache with mod_perl and openssl, and openldap,
> > that I discarded the hp compiler ( you should see the comments about the
> > hp compiler in the DBD::Oracle help! ).
