On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote:
> Cool. What do you think about Inline::Scheme::Guile and
> Inline::Scheme::PLT? Brian, what would Inline think about this:
I'm not really wild about three-part module names. They make for unweildy
JAPHs! Also, Guile is only partly Scheme - there are a number of pretty
large extensions that make Guile code not quite Scheme.
That said, if people generally (and Brian specifically) want languages
grouped by mostly-compatible syntax then it's ok with me. Inline::C::CPP
and Inline::C::CPP::Java perhaps? Oh, I kill me!
-sam
