From: Daniel E. Lautenschleger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Garrett Goebel wrote:
> 
> > It seems to me that _Inline, etc. could be avoided if you 
> followed Ingy's
> > instructions on how to build an a binary distribution using Inline.
> >
> > http://search.cpan.org/doc/INGY/Inline-0.43/Inline-FAQ.pod
> >
> > See the section titled: "How do I create a binary distribution using
> > Inline?"
> >
> > It even tells you how to make a PPM.
> 
> But what if the person receiving the file does not have PPM 
> installed on their machine?

It doesn't matter. Its irrelevant. I mentioned it because someone recently
was complaining about not being able to make PPMs...

> How about if they just want to click on an executable file
> and be on their way?

Make your module be binary distribution friendly per the documentation in
the Inline-FAQ. Then install it. The installed module will not need
Inline.pm, nor if my distant memory serves correctly, will it need the
_Inline directory. Then create a script or whatever which uses it, and use
PerlApp to bundle the whole shebang into an executable.

The result should be a self-contained executable which will work just as you
desire.


Some time around 12 months ago, I played around with structuring my Inline
using modules so that could be Inline-less binary distributions. I don't
think I ever needed to do the PerlApp thing with them, but it is something
to try. And should simplify the problem by removing the dependance on
Inline.pm.

Reply via email to