Send inn-workers mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of inn-workers digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. question about patch 10070 (Harald Dunkel)
   2. Re: question about patch 10070 (Julien ?LIE)
   3. Re: storage.conf(5) manpage name too generic? (Julien ?LIE)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:03:59 +0200
From: Harald Dunkel <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: question about patch 10070
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Hi folks,

https://inn.eyrie.org/trac/changeset/10070 tells me

Articles containing control characters or whitespace-only content lines
in their headers are now rejected by B<nnrpd> at injection time.

This appears to be pretty painful. AFAICT some Windows spam filters create
lines like

        X-Spam-Level: 

without any content after colon-space.

Wouldn't it be better to silently ignore all the empty "X-something: " 
lines?

I stumbled over this problem via mailpost. After the upgrade to 2.6.1
tons of EMails got rejected with an error message

inews failed: inews: cannot send article to server: 441 Invalid syntax 
encountered in headers (unexpected byte, no colon-space, or empty content 
line) inews: article not posted



Regards
Harri


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:50:08 +0200
From: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: question about patch 10070
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Hi Harald,

> Articles containing control characters or whitespace-only content lines
> in their headers are now rejected by B<nnrpd> at injection time.
> 
> This appears to be pretty painful. AFAICT some Windows spam filters create
> lines like
> 
>       X-Spam-Level:
> 
> without any content after colon-space.
> 
> I stumbled over this problem via mailpost. After the upgrade to 2.6.1
> tons of EMails got rejected with an error message

That was indeed a side effect of the patch, appearing in mail 
gatewaying.  I'm sorry it generated a regression in mailpost, that was 
not behaving how it should have.

That bug was fixed in patch 10156:
   https://inn.eyrie.org/trac/changeset/10156

-- 
Julien ?LIE

??Si uis pacem, ach?te des menhirs?!?? (Saugrenus)


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 22:17:08 +0200
From: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: storage.conf(5) manpage name too generic?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

Hi Russ and Dominik,

> While this isn't really a great excuse for using a very generic name, it's
> worth noting that INN has installed that config file and man page for 19
> years, or about six times longer than skopeo has existed.  So maybe they
> shouldn't have used a name that was already in use.... :)

We renamed "radius.conf" into "inn-radius.conf" in INN 2.5.4 but it was 
for good cause.  The libradius package obviously has precedence over 
INN!  And of course we kept homogeneity between the config file name and 
its associated man page.



> If we had it to do over again, we'd pick a name that was better
> namespaced, but it feels a bit late to rename it now.  We *could*, I
> suppose, but it's kind of a hassle, and I'm not sure it's worth the pain.

I also agree to keep the storage.conf(5) name.

-- 
Julien ?LIE

??Donner un sens plus pur aux mots de la tribu.?? (St?phane
   Mallarm?)


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
inn-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers

------------------------------

End of inn-workers Digest, Vol 98, Issue 5
******************************************

Reply via email to