Send inn-workers mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of inn-workers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: INN 2.7.0 feeding "local" newsgroup to peers (Julien ?LIE)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 23:03:47 +0200
From: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: INN 2.7.0 feeding "local" newsgroup to peers
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Hi Jesse,
> I'm noticing odd behavior with a new INN 2.7.0 setup.? When I post to
> the "local" newsgroup on my server it is being sent to many peers I
> would not expect.? I'm using newsfeeds configurations given to me by
> peers and there are a mix of styles.? So I'm not sure if almost all of
> my peers are providing an improper newsfeeds config, or if something has
> changed.
Your peers do not know that you carry a newsgroup named "local".
Besides what Kamil already said, I would just add:
> ?????? :*,!*.bina*,!*.bain*,!*.dateien*,!*.pictures*,!junk/!local\
When "*" is used, pseudo-groups like control.cancel are explicitly
marked to be transferred. If you then exclude newsgroups, you should
also exclude control articles for these newsgroups.
:*,!*.bina*,!*.bain*,!*.dateien*,!*.pictures*,!junk,!control,!control.*
would be better. This way, control articles for news.software.nntp will
still be fed (as they follow the propagation of their Newsgroups header
field), but control articles for alt.xxx.binary won't be fed (which is
what you expect).
Otherwise, all the contents of the pseudo-groups is sent, whatever the
Newsgroups header field is.
> ?????? :*,!control*,!junk,!local.*,\
Better say "!control,!control.*" as a hierarchy named controller.* for
instance would not be fed with that pattern.
> ?????? !@*.biana*,!@*.biinaries*,!@*bina*,!@*.bineries*,!@*.binia*,\
Is the "!@" pattern really working? ("@" would be enough, I'm not sure
"!@" is valid)
--
Julien ?LIE
??L'?ternit?, c'est long, surtout vers la fin.?? (Woody Allen)
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
inn-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers
------------------------------
End of inn-workers Digest, Vol 139, Issue 7
*******************************************
