Send inn-workers mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of inn-workers digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: nnrpd: adding blacklistd support (Julien ?LIE)
   2. Re: Disabling XBATCH by default in innd (Julien ?LIE)
   3. Re: Excluding Cancel-Lock for certain users (Julien ?LIE)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:51:58 +0200
From: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: nnrpd: adding blacklistd support
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

Hi all,

>> Adding it as --with-blacklist sounds like the right thing to do, yes.
>
> I've submitted a pull request for review at
> https://github.com/InterNetNews/inn/pull/234 for those interested.

Andreas' work is now merged upstream.
blacklistd (shipped with FreeBSD and NetBSD notably) is now natively 
supported by nnrpd.

-- 
Julien ?LIE

??Le dieu, dont l'oracle est ? Delphes, ne parle pas, ne dissimule pas?:
   il indique.?? (H?raclite d'?ph?se, fragment 93, traduction de Jean
   Voilquin)


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:56:19 +0200
From: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Disabling XBATCH by default in innd
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

Hi all,

>> It would become commented in incoming.conf:
>> #email: "[email protected]"
> 
> Oh, that's a great idea that for some reason I didn't think of.  I'm in
> favor of doing that.

Also done in CURRENT.

innupgrade will take care of the changes in incoming.conf:
- commenting the lines with removed "comment" or "email" parameters;
- renaming "nolist" and "noresendid" to "list" and "resendid" while 
inverting the related boolean value.


Also, "noxbatch" has been renamed to "xbatch".

Everything is now clearer in incoming.conf.

-- 
Julien ?LIE

??Tant qu'il y a des marmites, il y a de l'espoir?!?? (Ast?rix)


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 23:02:26 +0200
From: Julien ?LIE <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Excluding Cancel-Lock for certain users
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

Hi all,

> As an identity is always assigned by readers.conf, all posts are 
> considered to be sent by a known posting-account (the one appearing in 
> Injection-Info).
> Yet, it causes a problem with Cancel-Lock because some identities may be 
> shared between several persons.? Which means that any user with that 
> identity can cancel any other post from another user with the same 
> identity.

FYI, an "addcanlockuser" (defaulting to true) can now be added in access 
blocks to deactive the generation of a user Cancel-Lock for access 
blocks shared between several persons with the same assigned identity. 
Example:

     auth "example.com" {
         hosts: "*.example.com"
         auth: "ckpasswd -f <pathdb in inn.conf>/newsusers"
         default: "anonymous"
     }

     access regular {
         newsgroups: "*,!example.restricted.*"
         addcanlockuser: false
     }

     access full {
         users: "*,!anonymous"
         newsgroups: *
     }


Only an admin Cancel-Lock will be generated for anonymous users.

-- 
Julien ?LIE

??Tant qu'il y a des marmites, il y a de l'espoir?!?? (Ast?rix)


------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
inn-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers


------------------------------

End of inn-workers Digest, Vol 140, Issue 1
*******************************************

Reply via email to