Many great and ponderous things are said in regard to sex by Christians.
Throughout my teenage years we were told of the emotional intimacy effected by
sex, and this argument became one of those used to encourage us to be celibate
outside of marriage and faithful to one spouse.

Therefore it is interesting to see what the Old Testament says or implies about
sex and its implications. The Law of Moses was obviously central to the religion
of the Old Testament and in the New Testament the Law is described as the Law of
God and as "good and holy and true". So what does that Law say? 

Deuteronomy 21:15 takes for granted that a man may have two wives. That's a good
thing, because the same Law obliges a man to have more than wife wife in certain
circumstances. I'm referring to the Levirate marriage. I quote:

Deuteronomy 25:5-10   5 When brothers reside together, and one of them dies and
has no son, the wife of the deceased shall not be married outside the family to
a stranger. Her husband's brother shall go in to her, taking her in marriage,
and performing the duty of a husband's brother to her,  6 and the firstborn whom
she bears shall succeed to the name of the deceased brother, so that his name
may not be blotted out of Israel.  7 But if the man has no desire to marry his
brother's widow, then his brother's widow shall go up to the elders at the gate
and say, "My husband's brother refuses to perpetuate his brother's name in
Israel; he will not perform the duty of a husband's brother to me."  8 Then the
elders of his town shall summon him and speak to him. If he persists, saying, "I
have no desire to marry her,"  9 then his brother's wife shall go up to him in
the presence of the elders, pull his sandal off his foot, spit in his face, and
declare, "This is what is done to the man who does not build up his brother's
house."  10 ...

Clearly, in such cases, a man was obliged by the Law to take another wife and
sanctions were employed to shame him and his family if he did not. This is not
likely to have been a rare occurrence either. First, the death rate of men in
those days was probably high (battles, disease, etc); and second, such case laws
arose out of actual situations.

It is easy for some fundamentalists to dismiss the Law as obsolete for
Christians, but that's too easy. (In such cases it might be appropriate to push
a few buttons - mention the word "homosexuality" and the law of God, for
example.) Consider what obeying the law on Levirate marriages would involve.
Now, in asking this I'm not trying to encourage everyone to indulge in sexual
fantasies about their brother or sister-in-law. I'm just asking people to think
of the implications of this law for the relationship with one's wife/husband if
one's brother-in-law died. One is obliged to have sex with one's sister-in-law.
What does this do to one's relationship with one's first wife? One could find
the opportunity quite desirable, or one could find it quite detestable. The case
law above seems to have arisen in the latter case. But in either case, what does
this do to the notion of sexual intimacy and exclusivity?

It seems to me the "Law of God" in the Old Testament didn't give a hoot about
sexual intimacy and spiritual unity. Sex was all about reproduction. Anybody
else like to give their call on this one?

- Greg






------------------------------------------------------
- You are subscribed to the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the message body 'unsubscribe 
insights-l' (ell, not one (1))
See: http://nsw.uca.org.au/insights-l-information.htm
------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to