Rohan Pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Here's another thread-starter: when we pray to God as Lord or Father, 
>aren't we just perpetuating patriarchal patterns of dominance? 

I think this kind of language is another example of perpetuating an outdated view of 
God rather than patriarchal patterns of dominance.

In my view, God is not male and God is not female. In fact, God isn't a being at all 
but rather the "source of being". So using words like "Father" and "Lord" to describe 
God, particularly when these are almost the only words used, is extremely unhelpful. 
At the very least, I think we should be  using a true mixture of words to describe 
God. In preference, I think we should stick to gender-neutral words.

Cheers,

Jonathan


__________________________________________________________________
Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp
------------------------------------------------------
- You are subscribed to the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the message body 'unsubscribe 
insights-l' (ell, not one (1))
See: http://nsw.uca.org.au/insights-l-information.htm
------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to