>In the case below where you make a copy of your hard drive and store it >somewhere else, this will protect you against hardware failure, but it's >going to help if the files are already corrupted. Having two copies of >a corrupted file is just a useful as have 10 copies. ;-]
I think this is the crucial question. I have a double-sided method of back-up. I run on Windows XP and all documents created are placed in the My Documents folder. If older applications do not place their documents there by default, I change them so that they do. I use McAfee QuickBackup to automatically back up all files in this folder (and its sub-folders) every morning at 4 am. (Even I am usually asleep by then - trying to keep my melatonin levels high!) However, I have found from past experience that this is not enough. If you back up files created and have a hardware failure (e.g., your hard disk carks it), a lot of time goes into re-installing applications and then getting the updates for those applications. From past experience, this can lead to about a week's downtime, maybe more. This is very incapacitating. Therefore, I also duplicate my entire hard disk to a second hard disk using "Drive Image". Actually, I don't use the image option, but a simple copy, and then "hide" the duplicate hard disk. If the first hard disk goes down, I simply "unhide" the second, swap it to the right position on the HDD cable and I am up and running in about half an hour. I duplicate the main HDD about once a week. The problem, of course, is that corruption may already have been duplicated through either method. - Greg ------------------------------------------------------ - You are subscribed to the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and put in the message body 'unsubscribe insights-l' (ell, not one (1)) See: http://nsw.uca.org.au/insights-l-information.htm ------------------------------------------------------
