Title: Message
Just a reminder that the social justice archives on the UnitingCare NSW.ACT website include a euthanasia discussion kit, which looks at the issue of pain, the need for safeguards, some case studies, and the Northern Territory legislation (which the federal government disallowed - right decision for the wrong reasons), which had very inadequate safeguards. One of the big problems in the debate, it seems to me, is that too many people have no idea of how horrendous and dehumanising pain can be. A simple quote that "thou shalt not kill" is really no answer to unbearable pain and any church who takes this simplistic approach turns God into a monster. Romanticising pain (with idiot statements like "it can bring you closer to God") should rate as a serious crime against humanity and an unforgiveable heresy.
Having said that, we should also recognise that a lot of people support euthanasia for the wrong reasons. They think they want euthanasia to be an option, when all they really want is the right to refuse treatment - a right they already have (but that officious doctors sometimes try to undermine).  Particularly among older people, there is a concern that their dying will be artificially prolonged. The solution to this is not voluntary euthanasia (artificial shortening of dying). People need to make sure that everyone knows what limits they want on treatment at the end of life - by talking with their doctors and families, making an advance directive, giving someone power of attorney on medical matters with some clear statements of conditions under which treatment is not wanted (there are models available), and so on. And perhaps we need some family to sue a doctor for over-treatment and extension of pain and discomfort, as the claim is often made that what drives doctors to intervene in dying is the fear of litigation if they don't do everything that is available to keep the person alive, no matter what the circumstances. The other value of taking control while one is able to state what one wants is that proper documentation helps people and their families to differentiate between conditions where it is appropriate to refuse treatment and conditions that should be treated as they will not lead to death but only to discomfort and greater dependency if left untreated. 
We know from experience in some aged care facilities that there are some older people who are so afraid of their life being prolonged artificially  that they refuse all treatment, an approach which is quite harmful.
My view is that before we have legislation allowing voluntary euthanasia, we need to sort out these issues of communication, control and overtreatment so that people don't ask for euthanasia for the wrong reasons.
Ann
(Rev. Dr.) Ann Wansbrough
UnitingCare NSW.ACT
PO Box A 2178 Sydney South 1235
Phone (61) (02) 8267 4280 Fax (61) (02) 9267 4842
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: some news

Meeting told support for euthanasia growing
A Melbourne Uniting Church minister has told a public meeting in Adelaide that high numbers of people from all religious denominations support the idea of voluntary euthanasia. READ ON

What McNab is not reported as saying (which is not the same as 'did not say') is that most thoughtful religious people would want to be very careful about how voluntary euthanasia was permitted, but I think he's right - most Christians who have had to stand by and watch someone they care about die in great pain when their suffering might have been relieved are not keen on a blanket ban on voluntary euthanasia.

 

Reply via email to