On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:31:03AM -0500, James Carlson wrote: > Gary Mills writes: > > This file has one line appended once an hour. On the newly-booted > > boot environment, it had a gap of four hours. At the time I ran > > `luactivate', it reported: > > I haven't seen this behavior, but at a _guess_, it's at least possible > for the /etc/lu/ludb.local.xml information used to detect these > changes to be generated incorrectly. If I were trying to debug it, > that's where I'd start looking.
Thanks for the hint. I read some of the LU scripts, but quickly got lost. > > How could it have been updated on the new BE? There shouldn't have been > > a conflict. This was done on Solaris 10 5/08. > > Since this is S10 and not OpenSolaris, I'd recommend contacting Sun's > support group. (Brian should be able to get you pointed in the right > direction better than I.) I'll open a support case. I know how to do that, and can reproduce the problem easily. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
