Moriah, Mark, Jin and Sundar:

I got the x86 test image based on snv_113 from Moriah and had done the 
following testings:

So far all the issues that I had found are generic snv_113 issues and 
they are not introduced by the packaging move:

1. Initial install with ufs - OK
2. Zones install after initial install - OK, found bugs with generic snv_113
3. Diskless client install after initial install - OK, found bugs with 
generic snv_113
4. Initial install with zfs - OK
5. Need to do regular upgrade testing from s10u7 with zones - In Progress

I still need to do testing for sparc if Moriah can send me a pointer to 
the image.



Moriah Waterland wrote:
> Mark, Jim, and Sundar,
> 
> Thank you for agreeing to review my changes related to move of the
> SVR4 packaging code from the Legacy Nevada Install gate into ON.
> 
> I am sure that I have already mentioned the following but here is a
> quick overview:
> 
>     o This project is about moving the SVR4 packaging code to ON because
>       this code needs to live on and we need to move away from the
>       Legacy Install consolidation.
> 
>     o Patch code is not moving and is already dead in OpenSolaris.
>       David Comay is stopping the delivery of patch binaries in the
>       2009.06 release.
> 
>     o The only goal of this project is moving the code.  Yes, I know
>       that this means that problems are just moving from one place to
>       another but these issues must be dealt with separately.
> 
>     o Testing is on-going (Mary Ding has images she is working with and
>       I have additional tests I want to run etc..). I am reasonably
>       confident that this will not be an issue and I expect that if
>       changes need to be made they will be small. In other words, I
>       think that it is safe for you to start reviewing this now.
> 
> I am cc'ing this code review to install-discuss at opensolaris.org as well
> as several internal aliases.  Please let me know if you think of other
> aliases that this should also see this.  Once this posts to
> install-discuss, I will update the OpenSolaris project page for SVR4
> packaging with a link to this message.
> 
> The bug report contains information about the reasons behind a lot of
> the individual changes.  I have also included it in this email for your
> convenience.
> 
> BugId: ( http://monaco.sfbay/detail.jsf?cr=6739234 )
> 
>     6739234 move SVR4 packaging to ONNV gate
> 
> Webrev 1: This is a simple webrev of my changes to ON. It shows all the
> new files that I am adding to ON as well as a the small number of
> modifications that I made to several existing ON files.
> 
>     http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mwaterl/6739234.complete/webrev/
> 
> The first webrev shows all of the changes to ON but it doesn't show the
> actual source modifications that I made to individual files.  So I
> generated a second webrev that should help highlight the actual source
> changes that were required.
> 
> 
> Webrev 2: This webrev was created by taking a clean ON child and adding
> the files directly from the Legacy Nevada Install gate.  These files
> were inserted at their new locations.  Then the updated files from the
> SVR4 packaging move were added to the workspace so that reasonable diffs
> could be generated.
> 
>     http://cr.opensolaris.org/~mwaterl/6739234.changes_only/webrev/
> 
> 
> Please get your feedback to me by COB on Friday, May 1st.  Thanks again
> for your help with this code review.
> 
> -Moriah
> 
> 
> ========================================================================
> ========================================================================
> 
> 
> Suggested Fix
> =======
> 
> The location changes for the source code are as follows:
> Legacy Nevada Install gate: (The layout of the code in the old gate.)
>  o /ws/install-nv-gate/usr/src/
>     o cmd/pkgcmds/
>         hdrs/       
>         installf/    pkgcond/    pkgname/
>             pkgrm/        pkgadd/        pkginfo/
>         pkgparam/    pkgscripts/    pkgadm/       
>         pkginstall/    pkgproto/    pkgtrans/
>         pkgchk/        pkgmk/        pkgremove/
> 
>      o lib/libpkg/
>      o lib/libspmizones/
>      o lib/libinst/
> 
>      o pkgdefs/SUNWpkgcmdsr
>      o pkgdefs/SUNWpkgcmdsu
>             ||
>             ||
>             \/
> Nevada ON gate: (The new layout for the code in ON.)
>  o /ws/onnv-gate/usr/src/
>     o cmd/svr4pkg/
>         hdrs/        libinst/
>         installf/    pkgcond/    pkgname/
>             pkgrm/        pkgadd/        pkginfo/
>         pkgparam/    pkgscripts/    pkgadm/       
>         pkginstall/    pkgproto/    pkgtrans/
>         pkgchk/        pkgmk/        pkgremove/
> 
>      o lib/libpkg/
>         common/        i386/        sparc/
> 
>      o lib/libinstzones/
>         common/        i386/        sparc/
> 
>      o pkgdefs/SUNWpkgcmdsr
>      o pkgdefs/SUNWpkgcmdsu
> 
> My changes for this code move only pertained to what was absolutely
> necessary for this migration.  I am aware that there are quite a few
> other issues that could be fixed in this code, but they are out of scope
> for this project.
> 
> 
> Comments
> =======
> The following notes are intended to provide more detail about why I made
> certain changes:
> 
>  o Changed the name of the directory under cmd from pkgcmds to
> svr4pkg to disambiguate this code from the new IPS packaging code.
> 
>  o Moved libinst out of libraries and into cmd/svr4pkg/libinst. Libinst
> had compilation problems under the libraries directory in the ON
> gate because it calls functions that are defined in code under
> cmd/svr4pkg.  Spoke with Dave Marker about situation and he suggested
> this move because libinst is statically compiled, not delivered, and
> will only be used by the package commands.
> 
>  o Leaving libinstzones (formally known as libspmizones) as NOT large
> file aware.  To track this, I filed:
>     6833675 libinstzones is not large file aware
> 
>  o Created lint libraries for libinstzones and libpkg.  Not linting
> code under usr/src/cmd/svr4pkg.  Changes required for this are out of
> scope for this project.  To track this, I filed:
>     6833677 SVR4 package commands are not lint clean
> 
> o I took changes to libinstzones directly from libinstzones in the
> Caiman gate.  This is where the library name was changed.
>     http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/caiman/slim_source/
> 
>  o Moved the packages SUNWpkgcmdsr and SUNWpkgcmdsu from the install
> gate to the ON gate.   The only significant difference in what the
> packages are delivering is the name change of libspmizones to
> libinstzones.  All references to libspmizones in the packaging code have
> been changed to libinstzones.
> 
>  o Removed dependency from the packages for SUNWadmc as it is not required.
> 
>  o Used default text domain for the svr4pkg libraries or commands
> because it didn't seem reasonable to define a separate domain just
> for this old code.
> 
> o Once this code is putback to ON, deliveries of SUNWpkgcmdsu and
> SUNWpkgcmdsr from the Legacy Install gate will cease.  The code will not
> be yanked from the Legacy Nevada Install gate because the gate is in
> maintenance mode until it is completely decommissioned.


Reply via email to