Okay, after some finger bending I got our network guys to do a trace from the 
Internet router... There's nothing unusual that I see...problem is that 
ICMP/UDP seems to be squelched closer to POO (also, there are at least two 
routers and a FW between our OS test server and the Internet router however 
they are showing < 2ms times all the way) .  After a recent timeout I'm back to 
(with PKG_CLIENT_TIMEOUT=120):

-bash-3.2# pkg -R /tmp/os1 image-update
pkg: 0/1 catalogs successfully updated:
    timed out
pkg: SUNWipkg update check failed.


Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to pkg.opensolaris.org (72.5.123.21)

  1 adsl-76-199-211-62.dsl.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net (76.199.211.62) 16 msec 12 msec 
16 msec
  2 dist1-vlan130.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net (151.164.162.130) 12 msec 12 msec 12 msec
  3 151.164.93.188 128 msec 192 msec 204 msec
  4 ex1-p12-0.eqdltx.sbcglobal.net (151.164.40.29) 132 msec 96 msec 204 msec
  5 above-sbc-oc12.lga4.above.net (151.164.89.94) 12 msec 12 msec 12 msec
  6 vlan79.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.126) 16 msec
    vlan69.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.62) 12 msec
    vlan79.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.68.19.126) 24 msec
  7 ae-73-73.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.157) 20 msec
    ae-83-83.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.136.161) 16 msec 24 msec
  8 ae-3.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.132.77) 48 msec 52 msec 56 msec
  9 ae-92-92.csw4.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.30) 48 msec
    ae-62-62.csw1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.18) 48 msec
    ae-72-72.csw2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.22) 60 msec
 10 ae-93-93.ebr3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.45) 56 msec
    ae-63-63.ebr3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.33) 52 msec
    ae-73-73.ebr3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.69.137.37) 52 msec
 11 ae-2.ebr3.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.132.9) 68 msec 68 msec 68 msec
 12 ae-73-73.csw2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.230) 60 msec
    ae-93-93.csw4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.238) 72 msec
    ae-83-83.csw3.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.234) 56 msec
 13 ae-72-72.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.213) 72 msec
    ae-82-82.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.217) 68 msec
    ae-72-72.ebr2.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.213) 60 msec
 14 ae-1-6.bar2.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net (4.69.140.153) 56 msec 60 msec 60 msec
 15 ae-4-4.car2.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net (4.69.133.157) 60 msec 60 msec 64 msec
 16 INTERNAP-NE.car2.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net (4.71.44.6) 64 msec 76 msec 56 
msec
 17 border2.te8-1-bbnet2.sfo002.pnap.net (63.251.63.82) 60 msec 60 msec 60 msec
 18  *  *  *
 19  *  *  *
 20  *  *  *
 21  *  *  *
 22  *  *  *
 23  *  *  *
 24  *  *

Not sure where to go from here...

Justin


----- Original Message -----
From: Bart Smaalders <bart.smaald...@sun.com>
Date: Friday, October 3, 2008 8:55 pm
Subject: Re: [pkg-discuss] [install-discuss] alternative to     
pkg.opensolaris.org?
To: Justin Lee Ewing <jlewing at jrleindustries.com>
Cc: Brock Pytlik <bpytlik at Sun.COM>, install-discuss at opensolaris.org, pkg 
discuss <pkg-discuss at opensolaris.org>


> Justin Lee Ewing wrote:
> > Hmm... this is what I was seeing:
> > 
> > -bash-3.2# pkg refresh
> > pkg: 0/1 catalogs successfully updated:
> >     timed out
> > 
> > the refresh finally went through... now it's timing out on the image-update:
> > 
> > -bash-3.2# pkg -R /tmp/os1 image-update
> > Checking that SUNWipkg (in '/') is up to date...
> > PHASE                                          ITEMS
> > Indexing Packages                            527/527
> > DOWNLOAD                                    PKGS       FILES     
> XFER (MB)
> > SUNWcsl                                    7/549   160/29218   6.07/502.73
> > pkg: An unexpected error happened during image-update:
> > pkg: Maximum number of timeouts exceeded during download.
> > 
> > Here is the output you requested:
> > 
> > -bash-3.2# pkg version
> > 1b1547cb8655
> > 
> > Justin
> 
> Hmmm...
> 
> Is there anything unusual about this link?
> 
> What does traceroute pkg.opensolaris.org report?
> 
> - Bart
> 
> -- 
> Bart Smaalders                        Solaris Kernel Performance
> barts at cyber.eng.sun.com            http://blogs.sun.com/barts
> "You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."

Reply via email to