On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:31:24PM -0400, Bill Sommerfeld wrote: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 21:07 -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote: > > I suppose another way to answer this is "all aspects are debatable, as > > long as (a) the debate is resolved by someone ultimately writing code > > and (b) the end product still resembles what we were talking about at > > the beginning". > > so, who gets to decide who gets to write code?
By merit: are you writing quality code that shows an understanding of the problem space, the code base, the direction of the project and the general team dynamic? If so, then welcome to the team in whatever capacity you can provide. I think that's generally the way things work when people aren't assigned to projects by someone waving a paycheck in front of them and a pink slip behind. :) > I have on a couple occasions offered to contribute code to projects > under review at PSARC to resolve issues, and (for whatever reasons) > generally this hasn't been received well. Is this an expression of lament or surprise? Danek
