On 16/09/2007, Peter Tribble <peter.tribble at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/16/07, Danek Duvall <danek.duvall at sun.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 07:34:30PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> > > How does this work without a repository?
> >
> > Without a repository?  For the moment, we assume one, even if it's local.
> > We'll probably have to move beyond that, but I don't think it's going to
> > prove to be a common occurrence.
>
> Oh, I would assume that not having a repository would be the most
> common case. Most software suppliers wouldn't have one; most
> delivery mechanisms wouldn't support one.
>
> The repository model works fine if you're (a) talking about bundled
> software, and (b) you're prepared to trust the repository to make
> decisions for you. (In this I include the model where the customer can
> establish their own repository which can proxy or aggregate software
> according to local need, so they can determine what's included in the
> scope of the repository and what the policies are. And there would be
> the need to supply the capability for anybody to do that.)
>
> The problem arises if you don't do that. MegaCorp may have some
> heavily protected download system you have to go through that
> doesn't fit into a repository model; individuals building up packages
> to send to their friends shouldn't have to worry about the complexity.
> Distribution may be via ftp, e-mail attachments, disks on magazine
> covers, memory sticks given out at trade shows. And then many IT
> departments build their own deployment mechanisms that you
> have to submit to.
>
> So the repository is a nice optimization; it cannot be a critical
> component.

In principle, I agree, but from the technical side, I suppose it all
depends on what you consider a repository. i.e. is a zip file a "local
self-contained repository" ? :)

I'm only half-joking...

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
binarycrusader at gmail.com - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. " --Donald Knuth

Reply via email to