Stephen, Thanks for the clarification. Much appreciated.
> > So, has it indeed been decided that IPS is going to be used as the > > packaging system? > > I certainly admit to talking with the developers of the various > install sub-projects and asking them to make accommodations for image > packaging. In all meetings so far, the IPS feature set--even in its > prototype form--makes most things easier, and the things it currently > complicates we know how to work around. I'm still not sure what its feature set is - is this summarized anywhere? (And yes, I've read all available documentation and a reasonable fraction of the source code...) > To be clear: image packaging is under development, its developers can > be influenced and its design adjusted by well-reasoned arguments, and > image packaging will go through ARC review and code review prior to > integration in a consolidation. But, is image packaging planned to be the future packaging system, or is it possible for some other alternative to be proposed and integrated instead? Thanks, -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
