Dave Miner wrote:
> One other thing: I think there's insufficient attention paid to the ease > of building packages. If we really want ISV's to use packaging rather > than tarballs or their own scripts or third party installers, I think we > need a little more than pkgproto, pkgmk and some man pages (the > developer's guide is only barely beyond that, IMHO). We can perhaps say > that's out of scope, but should be explicitly recognized as a hole in > the story. Other issues you brought up are being discussed later on in this thread. As for this one, I wholeheartedly agree and agree that it's a hole in the Solaris developer's story. -jhf-
