On 03/29/10 08:36 AM, Shawn Walker wrote: > On 03/29/10 10:17 AM, Liane Praza wrote: >> On 03/28/10 08:36 PM, Richard Lowe wrote: >>> Alan Steinberg wrote: >>>> The package name that is being used comes from the automated installer >>>> manifest file. I was also wondering why these have not switched to the >>>> renamed packages. I would love to just try swapping this one out for >>>> the renamed version in my local .xml file and see if it builds. Is >>>> that worth giving a try, or is the problem really with the dependency >>>> above? >>> >>> I believe using service/network/smtp/sendmail will work, as it >>> completely bypasses the package I believe to be causing your problem. >>> >>> The resulting media should be equivalent, since all pkg would do with >>> SUNWsndm is chase through the rename to that same package. >> >> I'm still catching up on the thread, but yes it should. Please confirm. >> >> The problem is absolutely not with the other dependency. >> >> (Will start working through alternatives for a real fix.) > > The simplest option seems like back-publishing a new > SUNWsndm at 8.14.4-0.133 since the manifest for SUNWsndm at 8.14.3-0.133 was > just for the rename anyway and points to > service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.133. > > Or am I misunderstanding the cause of the original error?
I believe it is the correct option. I don't know how to give concrete instructions on how to do so at this point. liane
