On 03/29/10 10:17 AM, Liane Praza wrote: > On 03/28/10 08:36 PM, Richard Lowe wrote: >> Alan Steinberg wrote: >>> The package name that is being used comes from the automated installer >>> manifest file. I was also wondering why these have not switched to the >>> renamed packages. I would love to just try swapping this one out for >>> the renamed version in my local .xml file and see if it builds. Is >>> that worth giving a try, or is the problem really with the dependency >>> above? >> >> I believe using service/network/smtp/sendmail will work, as it >> completely bypasses the package I believe to be causing your problem. >> >> The resulting media should be equivalent, since all pkg would do with >> SUNWsndm is chase through the rename to that same package. > > I'm still catching up on the thread, but yes it should. Please confirm. > > The problem is absolutely not with the other dependency. > > (Will start working through alternatives for a real fix.)
The simplest option seems like back-publishing a new SUNWsndm at 8.14.4-0.133 since the manifest for SUNWsndm at 8.14.3-0.133 was just for the rename anyway and points to service/network/smtp/sendmail at 8.14.4-0.133. Or am I misunderstanding the cause of the original error? -Shawn
