Assaph Mehr wrote: >> Caveat: IANAID (I am not an Instiki developer). I'd love to hear from >> those who set the goals for the project whether or not they consider >> "there is no step 3" something that is important, or even possible to >> continue to deliver if Instiki-ar is to become the successor to the >> Madeleine-based instiki. > > IANAID either, but I don't see how is that sustainable over multiple > platforms.
IANAID (though I keep threatening to become one...) Seems to me that, if Instiki were to become a Rails engine, it could be "no step 3" in two ways simultaneously: 1. Package it as a standalone app which just happens to be based on Rails, and 2. Offer it as an engine which has "no step 3" if you're already running Rails. Jay Levitt _______________________________________________ Instiki-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/instiki-users
