John.zhao wrote:
Hi,Joe and Mark
May I make sure about the scope of this draft? I want to make sure
if it include the discussion related to those MIP also? The type of tunnel
here listed includes IP in IP, IPsec and IPv4 in IPv6 later. So if the
context also cover those scenario in MIP or not?
I believe the document intends to cover the use of tunnels wherever they occur in the Internet; that includes MIP, though it's just MIP's use of tunnels that would be covered (not the rest of MIP, e.g.).
Joe
Best Rgds, Thanks John.zhaoHi, all,I and Mark Townsley recently completed an I-D summarizing our presentation from the last IETF on tunnel issues.Comments welcome, of course. FYI, a related document on the IPv4 ID will be noted to this list shortly.Joe and Mark ------------------------------------- Filename: draft-touch-intarea-tunnels Revision: 00 Title: Tunnels in the Internet Architecture Creation_date: 2008-07-07 WG ID: Independent Submission Number_of_pages: 21 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-touch-intarea-tunnels-00.txt Abstract:This document discusses the role of tunnels in the Internet architecture. It explains their relationship to existing protocol layers, and the challenges in supporting tunneling._______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
