No IPv4 addresses to hand out == IPv6-only network (for purposes of this discussion anyway)
-Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Ted Lemon > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Int-area] practical issues with using v4-mapped addresses > for nat64 > > On Jul 22, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Dave Thaler wrote: > > If you have a dual-IP-version > > network and a host OS that supports both IPv4 and IPv6, why would > > anyone disable IPv4 on the host? That doesn't seem like a very > > important case to me. > > Perhaps because you don't have any IPv4 addresses to hand out, and > don't want to run a multilevel NAT infrastructure? > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
