That looks good but I would recommend that the values 0 and 0xFFFF for ar$hrd and ar$op be listed as Reserved.
Thanks, Donald -- ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-634-2066 (home) 155 Beaver Street Milford, MA 01757 USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I was unable to find existing rules, I have written a proposal for the > rules: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-arkko-arp-iana-rules-00.txt > > The motivation for writing this draft is two-fold: first, it is useful to > "clean up" our registries and attempt to ensure that most of them have > defined allocation procedures. Secondly, I would like the IANA to be able to > handle allocation requests without having to ask the IESG, as they now do. > The allocation rules in the draft have been crafted so that the common case > is FCFS and only if something drastic happens (multiple numbers needed, new > opcode) there's a requirement to escalate the request to the IETF. > > Comments appreciated. > > Jari > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
