Jari, Looks good. Your discussion of the use of the experimental values can be replaced just by saying that use of the experimental values must follow the guidelines in RFC 3692.
Cheers, Andy On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:33 AM, Jari Arkko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I was unable to find existing rules, I have written a proposal for the > rules: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-arkko-arp-iana-rules-00.txt > > The motivation for writing this draft is two-fold: first, it is useful to > "clean up" our registries and attempt to ensure that most of them have > defined allocation procedures. Secondly, I would like the IANA to be able to > handle allocation requests without having to ask the IESG, as they now do. > The allocation rules in the draft have been crafted so that the common case > is FCFS and only if something drastic happens (multiple numbers needed, new > opcode) there's a requirement to escalate the request to the IETF. > > Comments appreciated. > > Jari > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
