On 07/01/2011 07:42 p.m., Josh Rambo wrote: > That seems at odds with the goal of end-to-end transparency on the Internet. > If it boots up with NAT66 out of the box, then it requires user intervention > to remove that NAT66. You'd end up with NAT66 on every residential gateway > in the world.
End-to-end transparency in the sense that every node will be reachable from every node? -- IMHO, forget about it (see slide 13 of: http://www.gont.com.ar/talks/lacnog2010/fgont-lacnog2010-ipv6-security.pdf) Thanks, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: ferna...@gont.com.ar || fg...@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
