I'm in favor of it. It's a good use case of flow label for L3/4 load balancing.
Thanks B.R. Bing > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 8:46 PM > To: Internet Area > Cc: Julien Laganier; Ralph Droms > Subject: [Int-area] Call for adoption of > draft-carpenter-flow-label-balancing-02 > > Hi all, > This draft has been presented at intarea face to face meetings and has > received a bit of discussion. It has been difficult to gauge whether the > wg is interested in this work or not. This call is being initiated to > determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of > draft-carpenter-flow-label-balancing-02 as an intarea WG draft. Please > state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this > email. If you are not in favor, please also state your objections in > your response. This adoption call will complete on 2013-01-04. > > Regards > Suresh & Julien > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
