On 12/20/12 5:38 PM, Liubing (Leo) wrote:
I'm in favor of it. It's a good use case of flow label for L3/4 load balancing
RFC 6437 did not go nearly far enough in my opinion make the flow label suitable for this application.

The fact of the matter is if I attempted to use the flow label today as part of a load balancing scheme it would provide zero additional entropy, and what's more I still have to look at the upper layer header.

Furthermore the document proposes the use of flow label across muliple flows as a common "session key" across multiple flows which I personally feel is inconsistent with the notion of a flow, is certainly embedding upper layer (notionally above the l4 header) session information in the layer-3 header and suffers from the exposures described in section 6 of 6437 and making no attempt to ameliorate them.

Thanks

B.R.
Bing

-----Original Message-----
From: int-area-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 8:46 PM
To: Internet Area
Cc: Julien Laganier; Ralph Droms
Subject: [Int-area] Call for adoption of
draft-carpenter-flow-label-balancing-02

Hi all,
   This draft has been presented at intarea face to face meetings and has
received a bit of discussion. It has been difficult to gauge whether the
wg is interested in this work or not. This call is being initiated to
determine whether there is WG consensus towards adoption of
draft-carpenter-flow-label-balancing-02 as an intarea WG draft. Please
state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this
email. If you are not in favor, please also state your objections in
your response. This adoption call will complete on 2013-01-04.

Regards
Suresh & Julien


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area


_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to