Wes, > -----Original Message----- > > > [WEG] One might also argue that MS Outlook is a key component in many > corporate environments, but it's false equivalence to then assume that > this is because it's the best solution, rather than the truth, which is > that it's the "least bad" alternative. At least in NAT's case, we have > a better solution (IPv6). ;-)
[Linda] Can you show how IPv6 can solve the problem? The problem is the amount of addresses that DC Gateway has to handle when hosts in one subnet being spread across different Data Centers. We would like the all hosts in remote DCs to be represented by their corresponding Gateway nodes. If you have better suggestions, we'd love to hear from you. Linda _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
