On 2/19/2014 8:05 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
Hi Ron,
The draft that Joe and Fred are considering applies to environments where
egress routers are commonly
capable of reassembling at line rate. Since this is a different environment, it
should be addressed in
a separate draft.
No, that is not correct - the draft we are considering accounts for all
environments in which tunnel ingresses and egresses may be deployed.
+1 and -1
+1 that the Intarea tunnel doc should address the generic case of
tunnels that transit IP packets, including as many specific examples as
possible.
-1 that the GRE tunnel spec needs to start with "what is deployed", but
should compare that to the Intarea tunnel doc and provide a set of
"SHOULD" recommendations to help transition GRE tunneling to follow BCP.
(IMO the Intarea doc is really targeted as a BCP, even though previously
issued as informational).
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
