Hi Ron,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 11:39 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L; Joe Touch; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Int-area] New Version Notification for 
> draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-04.txt
> 
> Fred,
> 
> The word "tunnel" does not appear in RFC 2675.

That's OK; it doesn't need to. But the generic tunnel doc will
say that the more specific tunnel specs are free to define a
jumbo-in-jumbo encapsulation format since the length of an
IPv6 packet is not restricted to 64KB.

Thanks - Fred
[email protected]

> 
>                                Ron
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:48 PM
> To: Ronald Bonica; Joe Touch; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Int-area] New Version Notification for 
> draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-04.txt
> 
> Hi Ron,
> 
> > Can you provide a normative citation for the requirement that you state, 
> > below?
> 
> Sure - RFC2675.
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> 
> >                  Ron
> >
> >
> >
> > >For IPv6-over-IPv6 tunnels, the MTU is actually 4G. Do we want to mention 
> > >jumbograms somewhere?
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to