Hi Ron, > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 11:39 AM > To: Templin, Fred L; Joe Touch; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Int-area] New Version Notification for > draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-04.txt > > Fred, > > The word "tunnel" does not appear in RFC 2675.
That's OK; it doesn't need to. But the generic tunnel doc will say that the more specific tunnel specs are free to define a jumbo-in-jumbo encapsulation format since the length of an IPv6 packet is not restricted to 64KB. Thanks - Fred [email protected] > > Ron > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:48 PM > To: Ronald Bonica; Joe Touch; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Int-area] New Version Notification for > draft-bonica-intarea-gre-mtu-04.txt > > Hi Ron, > > > Can you provide a normative citation for the requirement that you state, > > below? > > Sure - RFC2675. > > Thanks - Fred > > > Ron > > > > > > > > >For IPv6-over-IPv6 tunnels, the MTU is actually 4G. Do we want to mention > > >jumbograms somewhere? > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
