Hi Scott,
At 06:49 16-06-2014, SHEPPARD, SCOTT wrote:
Can you be more specific in your concern?
" there has been some concerns about RFC 6302"
I am willing to have a go but more focused guidance is needed here.
There was a thread at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/perpass/current/msg00212.html
My interpretation of the BCP is that it recommends saving information
so that users can be tracked without taking into consideration the
privacy implications. The BCP states that "data-retention policies
are out of scope for [the] document". It can be argued that the IETF
is recommending a best practice which is surveillance-friendly.
My suggestion would be to give some thought to the privacy
implications, get some (public) discussion about the matter and
decide about the next steps.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
