On 6/17/2014 11:58 AM, S Moonesamy wrote:
...
Some persons raised concerns about those hums.
Hums aren't votes. It might represent those in attendance - but not
everyone attends meetings in general or plenaries in specific.
The key to understanding a BCP is its 2119-language. Because there
wasn't any in RFC 7258 (2119 isn't even cited), there was nothing to
really object to.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
