Hello Joe,
Follow-up below:
On 1/26/2015 10:31 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
The whole story for IP (L3) is:
.....
(C) - Those subnets can be internetworked using L3 (routers)
ONLY where they overlap (i.e., share a node).
This isn't true for routers that route over links that are not
part of a subnet.
......................
So far, "your" experience (you, the authors, the MANET community)
keeps asserting that there's something magic about that environment
that the Internet architecture and protocols haven't considered.
It's not magic. That's the point. And we don't say that the problems
have never been considered. From earlier email:
... We are simply trying to point out
that the effects do matter, and are worthy of consideration when
designing IP protocols.
Also from earlier email:
If you have a problem that isn't described above, it is you who need
to describe it. The burden of proof is on you to explain what's new.
What's new is collecting together these important matters
into a document that can be helpful. The lack of such a document
motivated the writing of the draft under discussion. Our indication
that it was needed came from experience in other working groups.
Regards,
Charlie P.
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
