Hi Joe Le 27 janv. 2015 18:08, "Joe Touch" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > On 1/27/2015 8:45 AM, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: >> >> Hi Joe >> >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Joe Touch <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> It's far too early to discuss whether this doc could *become* a >> useful WG doc; in it's current form, there's simply no hint of that >> yet. IMO, the authors should take another shot at it, and then we >> can see if there's really anything useful to pursue here. The >> current doc does NOT make that case yet. >> >> Can you be more specific? > > > I've tried. If what I've said so far isn't sufficient, then the draft needs substantial revision and we'll see from there. > > Again, the onus is on the draft to be clear. >
The draft is rather clear, but you are arguing that it is unuseful because it should include architectural considerations. Others say it is useful without architectural considerations. This is not necessarily a conflict. Why not have architectural considerations in another, subsequent draft? > > The current doc is essentially vacuous regarding new information on wireless subnets. We all already know they are composed of links that vary highly and that the links can be unidirectional. > > Please tell us something we haven't known and dealt with for decades. > If everything is common knowledge since ages, why don't we have an obvious ref to point to, with a link model people agree on? Best, Emmanuel
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
