Hi Ron, > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 9:13 AM > To: Joe Touch; Templin, Fred L; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Int-area] draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6 > > Joe, > > The latter. The following is text from the draft: > > " This document specifies GRE procedures for IPv6, used as either the > payload or delivery protocol. It updates RFC 2784 [RFC2784]. Like > RFC 2784, this specification describes GRE how has been implemented > by several vendors."
You are asking for Proposed Standards status. That goes beyond documenting just "what is", and specifies once and for all "what will forever be". Thanks - Fred [email protected] > Ron > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:24 AM > > To: Templin, Fred L; Ronald Bonica; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Int-area] draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6 > > > > > > > > On 2/24/2015 7:49 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > > > So, what I am saying is that tunnels should support a guaranteed > > > minimum MTU of 1500 bytes as in 'draft-templin-aerolink'. > > > > That depends on whether this document describes "what should be" vs. > > "what is". > > > > I had thought it was the latter. > > > > Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
