Hi Suresh, I see that you are also co-author on the draft? But, see below:
> -----Original Message----- > From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 11:52 AM > To: Ronald Bonica; Templin, Fred L; Joe Touch; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Int-area] draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6 > > Hi Ron, > > On 02/27/2015 07:13 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote: > > Guys, > > > > I would like to suggest that this discussion is beyond the scope of > > draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6. The chairs may correct me, but it might > even be outside the scope of this WG. > > Agree with you that the discussion is out of scope for the draft. The draft currently permits send PTBs that report a size less than 1280. That option was formerly reserved for only IPv6/IPv4 translators. So, if this document now recommends sending degenerate PTBs it needs to discuss the implications of doing so - or, it needs to cite another document that discusses the implications. Thanks - Fred [email protected] > I think it is may or may not be in the scope of the wg depending on what > actions may be required. 6man may be a better home depending on what > people are aiming to change. > > Thanks > Suresh _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
