On 3/2/2015 12:44 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > Hi Joe, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joe Touch [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 11:25 AM >> To: Templin, Fred L; Ronald Bonica; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Int-area] draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6 >> >> Fred, >> >> We've had this entire discussion before. >> >> We should label it with an name and in the future cite by reference. >> >> It is out of scope until the WG decides it's important to deal with this >> issue, IMO - and that hasn't happened yet. > > The GRE folks are saying that it is OK for the tunnel ingress to send PTB > with size less than 1280.
I'm not sure what you're getting at. Either they're saying that this is already what's deployed or they're saying it's something new. The former is the purpose of the current doc. The latter is new work. > That forces us to consider what happens when > a source node actually receives and acts on that message. It forces them to document existing behavior. Not for us to extrapolate. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
