On an even higher level note, RFC2473 already specifies generic encapsulation within IPv6 which implicitly includes GRE. So, if this document goes through it needs to say that it updates RFC2473.
Thanks – Fred [email protected] From: Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zuniga, Juan Carlos Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 1:27 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6 Dear Int-Area and 6man WGs, At the Int-Area WG meeting in Dallas there were some comments on draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6. It was decided to submit the document for WG Last Call to the Int-Area & 6man WGs as soon as the agreed changes were made. The document has now been updated accordingly, so this email starts an Int-Area/6man WGs Last Call on: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6-04 Please respond to this email to support the document and/or send comments by 2015-04-06. In addition, to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)": Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) Best, Juan Carlos Zuniga (as Int-Area WG co-chair)
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
