Hi Carlos, I am not clear what you propose here. UDP checksum includes IP header, GRE checksum does not.
Regards, Lucy From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpign...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:01 PM To: Black, David; Lucy yong Cc: Ronald P. Bonica; int-area@ietf.org<mailto:int-area@ietf.org>; i...@ietf.org<mailto:i...@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-intarea-gre-i...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-intarea-gre-i...@tools.ietf.org>; intarea-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:intarea-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6 Hi, Lucy, One approach is to add a 3.c) to the list that Ron shared. I think there is another potential approach to your initial comment: we could note that for a tunneling protocol (GRE), this is equivalent to the relaxation of the UDP checksum in RFC 6935, and keep the existing text. Fred, RFC 2473 does not mention checksums. Thanks, Carlos.
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
