Please see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/current/msg04521.html
Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 1:34 PM
> To: Ronald Bonica; [email protected]; Zuniga, Juan Carlos
> Subject: RE: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
>
> I am not satisfied yet that the tunnel ingress can ensure that probe packets
> take the same path as all data packets. With ECMP, it is possible that probes
> take path A with a sufficient MTU while some data packets take path B with
> insufficient MTU. If the authors know some way of ensuring that probes will
> take the same path as all data packets then it needs to be documented in the
> spec.
>
> Thanks - Fred
> [email protected]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ronald
> > Bonica
> > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 5:29 AM
> > To: [email protected]; Zuniga, Juan Carlos
> > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
> >
> > Juan Carlos,
> >
> > Thank you very much!
> >
> > Version 7 of the draft, posted on April 13, addresses all issue gathered
> > from
> the WG Last Call.
> >
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > > Authors,
> > >
> > > The WGLC has ended. Please produce a new version of the document
> > > taking into account the comments received on the lists and submit a
> > > summary of the different issues addressed in this new version.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Juan Carlos
> > > (as Int-Area WG co-chair)
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Int-area mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
