Hi Ron,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 10:55 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L; [email protected]; Zuniga, Juan Carlos
> Subject: RE: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
> 
> 
> Please see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area/current/msg04521.html

I don't see how you can just say "out of scope" to something that is prone
to operational ambiguity and call it good. There needs to at least be a
discussion about the challenges of probing in the presence of ECMP/LAG.

Thanks - Fred
[email protected]

>                                                              Ron
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 1:34 PM
> > To: Ronald Bonica; [email protected]; Zuniga, Juan Carlos
> > Subject: RE: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
> >
> > I am not satisfied yet that the tunnel ingress can ensure that probe packets
> > take the same path as all data packets. With ECMP, it is possible that 
> > probes
> > take path A with a sufficient MTU while some data packets take path B with
> > insufficient MTU. If the authors know some way of ensuring that probes will
> > take the same path as all data packets then it needs to be documented in the
> > spec.
> >
> > Thanks - Fred
> > [email protected]
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ronald
> > > Bonica
> > > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 5:29 AM
> > > To: [email protected]; Zuniga, Juan Carlos
> > > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-ipv6
> > >
> > > Juan Carlos,
> > >
> > > Thank you very much!
> > >
> > > Version 7 of the draft, posted on April 13, addresses all issue gathered 
> > > from
> > the WG Last Call.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> > > > Authors,
> > > >
> > > > The WGLC has ended. Please produce a new version of the document
> > > > taking into account the comments received on the lists and submit a
> > > > summary of the different issues addressed in this new version.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Juan Carlos
> > > > (as Int-Area WG co-chair)
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Int-area mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to