Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-intarea-gre-mtu-04: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-gre-mtu/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your work on this draft, I have a question I'd like to discuss to see if another security consideration needs to be added. This should be very quick to resolve. Do we need to worry about fragmentation overlap attacks when packets are reassembled? I see that you would not have to worry about it in cases where fragmentation is handled at a different layer as is the case with some of the methods as it might be addressed at that layer. Or does it not matter as the reassembled packets would be forwarded and the device reassembling wouldn't be processing the payload where an exploit could avoid detection? _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
