Locally we are using IP-in-UDP as provided by Mobile IPv4 specification
for NAT Traversal, RFC 5265. I guess it is sufficient, why another
document?
(I have not read the doc).
Alex
Le 19/05/2016 à 19:03, Wassim Haddad a écrit :
Dear all,
The authors of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03 (“Encapsulating IP in UDP”)
have requested that the working group adopt this work as a WG work item.
So far, WG chairs have not seen widespread support and considering that
lack of opposition does not qualify as support, we’re starting a working
group adoption call until June 3rd.
If you consider that the draft should be adopted as a WG work item,
please indicate the reason.
Regards,
Wassim & Juan Carlos
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
