Hi Alex,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Int-area [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexandre
> Petrescu
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 6:10 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Call for adoption of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03
>
> Locally we are using IP-in-UDP as provided by Mobile IPv4 specification for
> NAT
> Traversal, RFC 5265. I guess it is sufficient, why another document?
>
> (I have not read the doc).
If so, it'd better for you to read the doc first.
Best regards,
Xiaohu
> Alex
>
>
> Le 19/05/2016 à 19:03, Wassim Haddad a écrit :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The authors of draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-udp-03 ("Encapsulating IP in
> > UDP") have requested that the working group adopt this work as a WG work
> item.
> > So far, WG chairs have not seen widespread support and considering
> > that lack of opposition does not qualify as support, we're starting a
> > working group adoption call until June 3rd.
> >
> > If you consider that the draft should be adopted as a WG work item,
> > please indicate the reason.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Wassim & Juan Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Int-area mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
