On 5/20/2016 3:13 AM, Xuxiaohu wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > > > Thanks for your comment. Note that it’s WG adoption call rather than WGLC. >
I gave reasons for not adopting it already, including key flaws and the fact that this doc has not evolved based on feedback in the past (thus my confidence in expecting future changes is low). You need to do the work *first*. The WG is a place to polish, not for basic development. Joe
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
