On 5/30/2016 1:45 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> If you intend to support recursive datagram tunneling and believe that any 
> path has
> a minimum MTU, then you have to accept reassembly.

Agreed- at least one of the layers between the message tunnel and when
it recurses must support fragmentation and reassembly.

Those who deploy or sell systems otherwise are in denial, not a
counter-proof. Again, this is where compliance validation would be useful.

Joe

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to