Dear Omar, Am 30.03.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Khaled Omar: > I think all of you now know about IPv10 and what is the problem and how > IPv10 can solve it and how it can be deployed in a short time.
- Your IPv10 proposal doesn't solve the IPv6 deployment problems, you basically get an additional IPv10 deployment problem. - IPv10 doesn't allow an IPv6-only host to communicate to an IPv4-only host and vice versa as stated in the I-D. Hint: an IPv4-only host has got no idea what an IPv6 address is, let alone an "IPv10 address". - As others already pointed out: the proposal is technically flawed and does not work. > You can ask any question and I’ll do my best to give you answers to make > it clear for everyone so the IPv10 I-D can go forward through the IETF > standardization process and be published. Repeating this over and over again does not work. IMHO you only can move forward with a _technically sound_ proposal, otherwise many people will regard it as waste of time. > If there is a better solution for this problem I can participate freely > on its discussion. There are various WGs in the IETF that try to work towards better solutions. You may not like them, but they are at least rough community consensus. Best, Roland _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
