Hi, Fred (et al.),
On 3/29/2017 3:06 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > One other comment. I agree with figures 12 and 13 but (and I think this is > a crucial point) I think they need a supporting sentence or two explaining > why the procedure is "fragment then encapsulate" and not "encapsulate > then fragment". It's actually "on-path fragment (during transit processing, if that occurs), then encapsulate then (source) fragment.". Figs 12/13 represent the last two steps; fig 11 describes the first. I've added a paragraph and clarified the pseudocode to make that clear. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
