Dear Mohamed, See below:
On 2018-04-24 07:25, [email protected] wrote: > > [Med] I don't have a problem with the general intent of your text, my concern > is that you link those explicitly with RFC6302 which is misleading. RFC6302 > has a very clear focus: address sharing. > > [Med] But how this is related to RFC6302 context? RFC6302 is hopelessly out of date. It was specifically justified by a regulatory framework which no longer exists(!) and it takes into account none of the privacy guidances given by RFC6973. If we mean to say the privacy guidelines of RFC6973 should not be applied specifically in our recommendations for logging to internet-facing servers, then fine. If, however, we believe privacy guidelines apply also when we make recommendations to internet-facing servers (as we have done), then RFC6302 needs updating. I think this is the primary thing to establish. I'll provide more comments later. best, A -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55 _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
