Joe, > I still think it would be useful for this doc to describe how tunnels > interact with fragmentation (per draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels), which seems to > be something I’ve noted several times before.
There's nothing intrinsic in tunnels that require network layer fragmentation. The current IP in IP / GRE etc tunnel implementations do, but in principle we could design tunnel fragmentation/reassembly above the network layer. > I’m also still not thrilled with the title I’d be happier with “IP > fragmentation still not supported per requirements”, and I’d have to see > where this goes with final recommendations. If we were to conclude that IP fragmentation is done at the wrong layer... Cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
